Such a vastly different, commercial landscape will significantly change the social norms and perceptions of our communities. Much like the tobacco industry, the legalization of recreational marijuana will bring to Alaska extensive industrialization from Outside, corporate entities. Big Marijuana won’t be about homegrown local businesses.
Rather, it will be led by Outside companies seeking to make a profit off Alaskans. This initiative is being funded by big-dollar interests from the Lower 48, who see Alaska as a domino in their quest to legalize marijuana nationwide. This initiative will impose significant costs on Alaskans. The State of Alaska estimates that if passed, the initiative could increase costs to state government by more than $7 million per year in regulation and other increases in state government costs: Statement of Costs. This only represents a fraction of the costs that marijuana commercialization will impose on Alaska families, businesses, health, schools, productivity and more. There is a growing amount of evidence that marijuana is harmful. Since legalization in Colorado, there have been dozens of reports surrounding the negative impacts of marijuana and marijuana concentrates on the health of children and adults. Public health science is clear—if the initiative passes, rates of youth marijuana use will increase.
In addition, recent studies link marijuana use to abnormalities in the brain. The initiative as written eliminates the local option for communities in Alaska to be “dry” in regard to marijuana. It specifically allows individuals to transport and possess up to one ounce of marijuana anywhere and everywhere in Alaska, preventing villages and other communities from choosing to be marijuana-free. The proponents of marijuana legalization would like to make the issue about whether marijuana is worse than alcohol. For a state that already struggles with substance abuse, why add another legal drug to the mix? This initiative will not eliminate the black market for marijuana, as proponents suggest. The black market is still thriving in Colorado despite legalization. In fact, law enforcement and drug dealers in Colorado say legalization has actually enhanced the black market because street vendors, who aren't taxed, can sell the drug cheaper. Vote No on 2 had received a total of $180,499 in contributions.  PAC/ballot measure group Amount raised Amount spent Big Marijuana. Vote No on 2 $180,499 $267,612 Total $180,499 $267,612. Disclaimer: According to campaign finance reports published by the state of Alaska, the group, Big Marijuana. This was possible because the group was able to accrue debt. Donor Amount Northwest Strategies $32,577 Chenega Corporation $25,000 Robert B. New York Times said, “ Ideally, the federal government would repeal the ban on marijuana, so states could set their own policies without worrying about the possibility of a crackdown on citizens violating federal law. Even though a majority of Americans favor legalization, Congress shows no sign of budging. So it’s better for the states to take the lead than to wait for an epiphany on Capitol Hill that may never come. The Daily News-Miner said, “ Measure 2 is, bluntly, poorly worded. It is vague to the point of being reckless in that it fails to specify, for example, what controls would be in place to ensure a legalized marijuana market is run properly and without harm to Alaskans. It leaves that task for later, though we don’t know when that would be. Also, the state would incur a substantial cost if Measure 2 is approved — up to $7 million in implementation costs during the first year, according to information developed by the Legislative Affairs Agency and included in the official election pamphlet. In May and August, Public Policy Polling published two separate polls on Measure 2. The question asked of poll respondents in both instances read as follows:   On the November ballot, there will be an Alaska Marijuana Legalization Measure. This would allow people age 21 and older to possess up to one ounce of marijuana and up to six plants. It would make the manufacture, sale, and possession of marijuana paraphernalia legal.
If the election was today, would you vote 'yes' or 'no' on this measure?  In October, pollster Ivan Moore and Dittman Research each published a poll on Measure 2. The question asked of poll respondents in the Ivan Moore poll read as follows:  “ There is an initiative on the General election ballot that would tax and regulate the production, sale, and use of marijuana in Alaska. Criminal penalties would be removed for adults over the age of 21 who possess up to an ounce of marijuana, and constitutional protections allowing home cultivation would be preserved.
The question asked of poll respondents in the Dittman Research poll read as follows:  “ Ballot Measure 2 is a bill that would tax and regulate the production, sale, and use of marijuana in Alaska for people 21 years of age or older.